Kudos to Rand Paul

by Pejman Yousefzadeh on April 2, 2011

He has the Senate tied up in knots, and he has the Obama Administration and Congressional Democrats squirming in discomfort:

Here’s the back story: On Wednesday, Paul, with little notice, attached an amendment to the small-business re-authorization bill. The amendment, which chastises President Obama for his actions in Libya, urges members to adopt the president’s own words as “the sense of the Senate.”

To make his point, Paul quoted, in the legislative language, from Obama’s 2007 remarks on the subject: “The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.” According to Paul’s office, “the measure aims to put the Senate on record affirming Congress as the body with constitutional authority on matters of war.”

GOP sources tell National Review Online that Paul’s proposal flummoxed Reid, who does not want his members to have to weigh in on Obama’s dusty quote about congressional authority, even if the vote is only to table the measure.

Republicans speculate that Reid was already irked, sensing disarray in his caucus over the McConnell-Inhofe amendment to block carbon regulation at the Environmental Protection Agency. Paul’s proposal simply added fuel to the docket fire. Senate Democrats who are up for reelection in 2012 are quite sensitive to tricky amendment votes, and Reid, some say, may have simply thrown up his hands. For Democrats, a weekend to sort things things out is more appealing than a tense Friday in the cloakroom.

“Paul’s Libya amendment has brought the Senate to a standstill because Reid doesn’t know how to handle it,” one GOP aide tells me. “If he allows a vote, Democrats are forced to either disagree with then-senator Obama or with President Obama. It’s possible that Reid just yanks the bill or files cloture, seems he may do anything to avoid a vote on Paul’s amendment.”

Still, during a testy floor exchange Wednesday with Sen. Dick Durbin (D., Ill.), the Kentucky freshman argued that his amendment deserves a vote, and fast. “In Afghanistan and Iraq, with all the complaints from many people on these wars that we were involved in, President Bush did come and ask for the authorization of force,” he said. “We’ve had two to three weeks of this issue. They had time to go to the U.N. They had time to go to the Arab League. They had time to go to everyone. I think you should be insulted the way I am insulted they never came to Congress.”

Durbin fired back that Bush, by coming to Congress, actually “broke precedent.” Paul looked on, bemused.

Of course, one may alternatively conclude that it is the Obama Administration and Congressional Democrats who have themselves tied up in knots, and Paul is just pointing that fact out to the country. In any event, Paul deserves congratulations for having highlighted the President’s hypocrisy on this issue. If Paul wants to be even more mischievous, he can include Laurence Tribe’s words, and Joe Biden’s words into his “sense of the Senate” amendment. Perhaps an additional “sense of the Senate” amendment or resolution will note that the Obama Administration is now fully on board with John Yoo’s concept of Presidential wartime authority.

  • Phil

    OK, so Rand was clever and put Reid in difficult position. In the meantime we have a small business authorization bill that is stuck in the legislative process because a clever Rand decided that was the appropriate place to debate war powers authority? It’s this sort of behavior that makes Congress entertaining to watch but entirely ineffective at governing.

Previous post:

Next post: