Chinese Belligerence

by Pejman Yousefzadeh on January 31, 2010


As I have discussed in the past, I don’t believe that China is the rising hegemon that many people think it to be. Still, there is every reason to be concerned when one sees that the Chinese are becoming increasingly hostile over the smallest things:

China’s indignant reaction to the announcement of U.S. plans to sell weapons to Taiwan appears to be in keeping with a new triumphalist attitude from Beijing that is worrying governments and analysts across the globe.

From the Copenhagen climate change conference to Internet freedom to China’s border with India, China observers have noticed a tough tone emanating from its government, its representatives and influential analysts from its state-funded think tanks.

Calling in U.S. Ambassador Jon Huntsman on Saturday, Chinese Vice Foreign Minister He Yafei said the United States would be responsible for “serious repercussions” if it did not reverse the decision to sell Taiwan $6.4 billion worth of helicopters, Patriot Advanced Capability-3 missiles, minesweepers and communications gear. The reaction came even though China has known for months about the planned deal, U.S. officials said.

“There has been a change in China’s attitude,” said Kenneth G. Lieberthal, a former senior National Security Council official who is currently at the Brookings Institution. “The Chinese find with startling speed that people have come to view them as a major global player. And that has fed a sense of confidence.”

Lieberthal said another factor in China’s new tone is a sense that after two centuries of exploitation by the West, China is resuming its role as one of the great nations of the world.

This new posture has befuddled Western officials and analysts: Is it just China’s tone that is changing or are its policies changing as well?

The article goes on to note a number of disturbing instances of Chinese stridency, and Western cowering in response to that stridency. This is precisely the wrong tone to send to the Chinese, who must be made to understand that they cannot wantonly bully countries–especially when the Chinese are not nearly as strong as they seem to believe that they are.

It is, of course, more than a little disturbing that–as Daniel Blumenthal points out–the Obama Administration is engaged in a policy of appeasement vis-à-vis China. It is even more disturbing that the Administration’s appeasement policy is accomplishing nothing, and that the Administration has gone so far as to significantly reduce intelligence gathering activities concerning China.

Previous post:

Next post: