Of Mountains, Molehills, And Ron Paul

by Pejman Yousefzadeh on May 5, 2009

David Weigel is a very good writer and I would recommend his work to just about anyone, but I have to disagree with the tone and tenor of his piece on Ron Paul’s supposed influence in the House GOP caucus. Noting that “a few members of Congress—as many as 10, sometimes fewer” gather “from time to time” to listen to a talk by an expert Paul promotes, Weigel concludes that “[m]ore Republicans have started listening” to Paul. Perhaps, strictly speaking, “more” have, but when it comes to exercising influence in the House GOP caucus, Paul had nowhere to go but up. As an iconoclast in the caucus, Paul generally attracted amusement and quizzical interest, but never commanded a following. He has a few more people paying attention now, but just as one swallow does not a summer make, “10, sometimes fewer” House GOP members at a luncheon does not a Libertarian Boss Tweed make either.

Weigel is quite right to suggest that the GOP is looking for a unifying leader, and to be sure, Paul has recognized an opportunity to step into the vacuum. However, the fact that Michele Bachmann asks Tim Geithner some questions inspired by luncheons Paul has thrown does not indicate that Paul is some kind of seminal leader-to-be of the GOP. There are a lot of people whose leadership profiles have grown as a consequence of the most recent election and the void it has left at the top of the Republican hierarchy; Eric Cantor, Mitch McConnell, Tom Coburn, Jon Huntsman, Bobby Jindal, and Mitt Romney, just to name a few. Each of them commands more attention and interest than Paul does.

I suppose that the possibility does exist–theoretically–that the House GOP will mass-convert to the Austrian School of Economics. I just don’t see it, however. Ron Paul is more a passing fad than he is a voice of the future.

  • Idahoj1

    Commanding attention of the herd is not leadership.
    And thus the spineless, hypocritical hierarchy scramble for top spot of that passing fad know as the GOP.
    Ron Paul speaks above party concerns, and has never been a loyalist to anything but the Constitution and his country.
    Each of our representatives mouth an oath claiming they have the same priority in office, but only a true leader keeps his word.

  • edw987

    There is a little more than that – he has 124 co-sponsors of HR 1207 Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2009, and counting.

  • tbills

    Pejman Yousefzadeh – other than getting more reads than any story on this website, what was the purpose of writing this? I know that putting Ron Paul in the title of an article will draw thousands of clicks, but c’mon.

    Oh – this line “Ron Paul is more a passing fad than he is a voice of the future.”

    I dont think so, I think you’d hope it to be that way. Maybe if enough people in the media keep saying it, we’ll go away. NO CHANCE. You are on notice Pejman Yousefzadeh, apologize to the Ron Paul Revolution for your mistakes.

Previous post:

Next post: